Is Tome better than Gamma for building narrative-driven presentations?

I create a lot of presentations that are more storytelling-focused than data-focused. Think pitch decks, thought leadership pieces, strategic vision documents where the narrative arc matters as much as the information content. I have tried Gamma and found it good for structured informational decks but something about the output felt a bit functional and lacking in the kind of flow and visual drama that makes a presentation feel compelling rather than just clear.

Tome has been described to me as being more oriented toward narrative and visual storytelling, with a different approach to layout and pacing that might suit my use case better. I cannot entirely tell from the product website whether that is a genuine design philosophy difference or just marketing language. I want to know from people who have used both tools whether there is a real practical difference in the type of output each one produces.

Specifically I am curious whether Tome's AI generates content that feels more like it understands the narrative structure of what you are trying to say rather than just organising information into slides. I am also interested in the visual quality and whether the layouts feel more dynamic and designed or whether they have the same template-y quality that I find limiting in most AI presentation tools.